A response to the first ad, I think it's sending
a bad message to viewers yet it is an amusing photo. The ad is imp
lying that girl's l
ike the smell of chemi
cals and d
isgusting odours. And th
at they would follow them because of
it. The reason why it's so a
musing to me is because it is just like today's Axe
commercial. S
pray once and the
y'll follow you k
ind of thi
ng.
Ummm, about the second ad... tapeworms do not seem like a
good idea. I think that is a little disturbing. Yeah ma
ybe tapeworms may be able to help y
ou get rid of the f
at, however how do u get the tapeworm
back out of y
ou? That's pret
ty dangerous and reckless in my opinion. Al
though I agree t
hat fat should be banish
ed.
The t
hird ad is terrible
in my opinion because when people
see
doctors smoking "camels" then people will think that it is ok to smoke, since they are
doctors and kn
ew the ropes of health. This ad is displaying bad inte
ntions in people and should not even be there. This ad is not appropriate at all because they are encouraging people to s
moke cigarette
s when they themselves know it is wrong.
The fourth ad seems quite odd. They seem to like eating fat. Or imply that it is
good to eat fat. I gues
s on one h
and it is appropriate si
nce it is a bit better than butter or margarine, but on the other han
d lard
is not that heal
thy either... St
ill this ad i
s not as bad as the ot
her
ads.
These ads
right now suggest that it was ok to
destroy your body back then. T
hey are also saying that society b
ack the
n is corrupted and messed up. I think this because
why would they encoura
ge dangerous and stupid things back then? These ads also show that they don't care about the
ir body or that it might
deteriorate.Ads
today and back then are not that different, in my opinion. Ads form the past and now are sti
ll trying to encourage us people to try ba
d things and destro
y our body. Except
in t
o
day's a
ds they use scientific jargon to lure pe
ople
in.
Considering gender roles in these ads, for the fat
ty ads they only seem to be targeting girls not guys. And for the cigarette ad they seem to be mainly targeting guys. They're being sexist in my opinion mentioning that girls are the only one who would do that stupid stuff, and that guys are the main smokers and that girls would not.
Overall ads then and ads now imply harmful toxins and encourage us people to do it. Also that ads would say anything to get people to draw in and buy the products.
Here are a few other vintage ads.
I found an old Gillette ad that shows a baby using a shaver. Made me laugh and also realize that Gillette has been around for a real long time.
Also found a few cigarette ads like the other one.
2 comments:
Kristianne! Indeed you have copied Alicia! lol :)
In the olden times, women were not considered equal to men. Even today, in some countries, men are even allowed to rape women. I`m assuming this was probably the reason why the ads targeted women so much. It was because women were weawk, and they had to do whatever men told them to do. I feel like I just repeated myself.
But today, there are less ads like these, and more ads that help you fulfill a healthy lifestyle.
-Debbie
Wow, this topic still makes me laugh.
So much sexism and pure ignorance. But then again, what did they know back then, right? And even then, the sexism still hasn't ceased. It's disappointing really. However we're getting better and better at these ads - promoting the good things in life, like even smiling.
I loved the ads you added in, very interesting. The pork one was very disturbing indeed. Nice blog! =)
Post a Comment